At a glance
The essential OMOP / OHDSI shelf.
Not whatever is newest, but the things to know. Foundational publications, protocols, documentation, videos, and grey literature, curated for people entering the OHDSI maternal & child health space.
Publications
Foundational reading
Start here if you work in maternal & child health
Assessment of real-world evidence research competencies in federated research networks: a maternal health fellowship program evaluation
JAMIA Open. The most directly relevant paper for this audience, an evaluation of a maternal health fellowship that built RWE and federated-network research competencies. If you're a MCH expert entering observational research, this is your map.
The methods shelf
A deeper set once you are ready, grouped by theme. You do not need all of these on day one, since the Book of OHDSI plus the founding vision paper is plenty to start.
Vision & community
- Book
The Book of OHDSI
The canonical reference for the CDM, vocabularies, and the full analytic workflow. Start here.
- Paper
Hripcsak et al. (2015), OHDSI: Opportunities for Observational Researchers
The founding statement of the collaborative and its goals.
Reliability and calibration
- Paper
Schuemie et al. (2014), Why empirical calibration is needed to correct p-values
Introduces empirical calibration against negative controls.
- Paper
Schuemie et al. (2018), Empirical confidence interval calibration (PNAS)
Extends calibration from p-values to confidence intervals using positive and negative controls.
- Paper
Schuemie et al. (2020), How confident are we about observational findings? A benchmark study
The OHDSI methods benchmark and reference-set thinking behind method evaluation.
Estimation, prediction & phenotypes
- Paper
Suchard et al. (2019), Comparative effectiveness of antihypertensives (LEGEND-HTN, Lancet)
Flagship demonstration of high-throughput, systematically calibrated network estimation.
- Paper
Reps et al. (2018), Standardized patient-level prediction framework (JAMIA)
The PLP framework for building and evaluating prediction models on observational data.
- Paper
Swerdel et al. (2019), PheValuator
Estimating phenotype sensitivity/specificity/PPV without chart review.
Data quality, privacy & SDoH
- Paper
Kahn et al. (2016), Harmonized data quality assessment framework
Conformance, completeness and plausibility crossed with verification and validation, which is the data-quality backbone.
- Paper
Blacketer et al. (2021), Evaluating observational data quality
The Kahn framework as executable checks, and the write-up behind the DataQualityDashboard.
- Paper
Hripcsak et al. (2016), Preserving temporal relations while maintaining privacy
The Shift-and-Truncate method for obscuring dates while preserving within-patient intervals.
- Paper
Cook, Sachs & Weiskopf (2022), Quality of SDoH data in the EHR
Applies DQ dimensions to social-determinants variables; plausibility is the top issue.
Search the whole corpus
- Search
OHDSI Community Intelligence Platform
Articles, videos, repositories, discussions, and documentation with relevance scoring. Try maternal, pregnancy, or pediatric.
Protocols & study packages
Protocols to learn from
- Protocol
OHDSI Example Study Protocol
An example OHDSI study package for checking that your site can run a network study using HADES, and the cleanest way to see how one is structured before building your own.
Watch
Videos
- Channel
OHDSI on YouTube
Community calls, tutorials, and symposium talks.
- Channel
Dr. Danielle the Data Diva
Plain-language explainers of OMOP and observational research.
Featured maternal & child health talks from the OHDSI community, hand-picked rather than whatever is newest.
Documentation
Reference you'll return to
- Docs
OMOP CDM specification
The canonical table/field reference.
- Docs
ATHENA vocabularies
Download and browse the OMOP standardized vocabularies.
- Docs
OHDSI software tools
The full open-source stack for building and running observational studies.